Session 2
Monday 15th May
We are reminded this is a journey of self-discovery – where we are biased or not. This dialogic space is supported by pre- and post-tasks which inform what we do in the session. We discuss trigger warnings – a statement at the start of the video, or piece of writing alerting the reader or viewer to the fact that it contains something possibly upsetting. Our tutor muses – ‘Does not dealing with things reduces our ability to deal with things? How and when would I be safe to deal with this?’ Self-analysis, introspection and reflection. The aim is to demonstrate an understanding of Intersectionality with a focus.
I found the second session much more engaging, as a group I felt we had more understanding of how to get the most from the day. We had made time for the pre-tasks; key to the session and got involved in the discussions both in the chat and by turning on our microphones. It felt very different from the first session. It was a comfort to me that others did not understand some of the key terms we were asked to definite, I am learning through every task we are challenged with in this unit. Key points for me were about intersectionality and how disabilities can be unseen. Also, how we either want justice and equality for all or not, there can be no in between.
Reading – empathy is lifelong work. ‘Some’ racism is not my problem or real – supporting the uncomfortable nature of the honesty, use these moments to move your thinking on, keep thinking, trying, it’s complicated and very difficult physically and emotionally – Stacey out tutor tells us.

Task 1 – Review of Session 1
Learn, teach and assess – engage in the bigger picture in society. I didn’t enjoy the session – too many pre-tasks, we had to take in the learning listening to the verbal while also trying to navigate the information in the class ‘chat’ it felt excessive. It was also a shock to be back online. Learning about Positionality & bias was very interesting and made a lot of sense but it also felt overwhelming, I missed being in person. We are encouraged to ask questions & get feedback – we all get something from the session. The content is brilliant, but the format of long online sessions, is not very inclusive. The context feels very personal yet learning online is not. The pace has a negative structure.

Task 2 – Key Terms
Which did you find hard or easy? This is fascinating especially completing within a short time frame, there are many I am familiar with but others I find harder to define – ‘Politically black, Whiteness Intersectionality.’ We discuss definitions – A ‘refugee’ is someone who has to leave, a ‘migrant’ didn’t have to leave – immigration adds up to diaspora. ‘Politically black’ – arises from black political groups in the 1960s and 70s. Communities came together to deal with race politics – the black arts movement in the Midlands in 1980s was self organised – social, political climate & race politics of the 80s and 90s. People had different ideas of what this means. As tutors we are encouraged to figure out the tools for how to be inclusive in our practice. In our teaching, research and practice, we must engage with people of diverse ethnicities, gender, abilities and faiths and reflect on this through our blogging groups, peer-to-peer sessions. Be involved and engaged in social justice. We must understand that our students have experiences, characteristics. race, gender, religions, physical abilities, cultural backgrounds, beliefs), learning styles and needs which need to be considered and supported when devising and creating our learning environment and curricula. Bringing this self-awareness to our teaching and our work.
Positionality and the correct term to use – what are the correct terms to use? Some people prefer black some prefer colour – if you are unsure, it is best to ask people what they would like to be called. If you can’t ask someone when writing, select the term you feel is best, explain why you use that term and your positionality in that context, if your positionality factors into your use of the term.
Intersectionality – Kimberly Crenshaw coined the term, originally used in a legal context 30 years ago. Kimberly is an American civil rights advocate who wrote about Intersectionality. A black woman’s place in discourse, not art and design context. After George Floyd a lot of people wrote about racism, but Kimberly started this conversation. How has she written about this? How do we feel about it into the art and design context? How does this feel within my working in our context and teaching in art and design? She highlighted the structural disadvantages for black women in comparison to her colleagues such as white working-class men. As a black woman she wasn’t represented, who do I align myself with? How does disability come into these specific, unique struggles compounding disadvantage? A framework for disadvantages – structural, continue black and female and disability etc What does this mean within art & design? How might it be helpful? Inclusivity and social justice – relevant as art educators. Empathetic assessment for s students and the issues they might be dealing with. I loved the analogy my classmate gave, it was incredibly insightful: “Think of these as a series of rooms linked by doors. For some students the doors are already open, for other students, they have to push hard at every door to get it to open so that by their time they arrive to learn they are already very tired”. Intersectionality compounding – “the idea that the student might be pushing two thick doors together rather than just one. We are not all equal but starting from different places in the room. We add thickness to certain doors.” I am taken by the visual description of this statement that so clearly depicts the inequality of a student’s starting point dependent on so many different factors.
Task 3 – Case study on Race/Gender
With the case study we discuss sitting in silence is also doing a lot, not calling out and not stepping in is condoning an individual’s behaviour. If your choice is silence you are with the oppressor – wow! I had not thought of this but of course, so true. The article felt uncomfortable to read, the author expresses remorse about the situation that occurred, yet he was still passive, he didn’t own his guilt. I wonder how long after the event he went back to apologise. The behaviour was racist, ‘white fragility’ – we feel uncomfortable being called out. We are in a system set up like this. Desmond Tutu “If you’re neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of the mouse, you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality”. Something terrible must have happened but it took the person a long time to apologise and they still didn’t accept that it was racism. We discuss the importance of self-care, consider how much energy you put into things, choose which battle you are going to fight. We are one person each, collectively we make up society, however small the action if you can, you must take it. Stacey reminds us Inclusive practice is not easy, be creative and work the system. I would have called out the racism, it is good that he apologised. The tutor handled it with grace, power and dignity. I hope that I would do the same. The apology was a start, it’s never too late to try and change. He came forward – which is growth. The difference between not being racist and being anti-racist – it is not enough to just be not racist you have to put in the extra work through action. His apology was guilt rather than to protect & uplift the tutor.
Task 4 – Not all Disabilities are Visible
We reflect on the ‘Invisible condition’ – sometimes having to draw attention to difficult moments, what happens at work when you have to say ‘I can’t do this to stay well’ but maintain professionalism – I have a disability people can’t see, there is little empathy or understanding of it, yet I live with it and it affects me, my ability to perform every moment of my life, I never get a day off from this. I hope it makes me more understanding to others. Burn out – at what cost? Horizontal despite hierarchical system. How will we do this or change this? There is a value to how productive we are, impact on work – you don’t look sick. Disability rights movement, forced into working, change the way we work, centered care to inclusivity, inaccessibility and exclusive. A culture that is killing us – I get this from personal experience. Some are considered lazy when they are managing multiple health issues, sometimes we have to choose not to progress (which is seen as a measurement of success) for health care decisions. ‘Busy are the noises from my body.’
Disability
We meet Ual disability professor, educator and coach – Carys Kennedy. I’ve attended courses with her previously, she is an amazing font of knowledge on the subject. We discuss that not all disabilities are visible. Intersectionality – disability is very anti-capitalistic. Be aware that students coming late may have had to put other peoples needs first. As someone with a disability she reminds us – you don’t have to apologise for self-care. I adjust myself to ‘fit in’ with a work schedule. UAL like most work institutes, rest is not allowed for health. We must prioritise our own health. A capitalist framework – the power of rest as a form of resistance. The social model of disability 30 years on. Consider the positionality: disability is not something we have, it’s something done to a person – attitudinal or environmental such as a flight of stairs as a disability barrier, lack of computer equipment or simply too much noise in the classroom. We can come across attitudinal barriers, social & economic – diagnosis helps with this experience, some students end up supported but not all. Social model of disability is Marxist theory. Capitalism is a disabling barrier – a normal working week. putting themselves at risk due to fulfilling working requirements. With hidden disability – flexibility is needed, we can often spot people who need help. It is important to notice the unseen – we don’t always know who our disabled students are. Anticipate what the barriers might be, how do we foster an environment, share resources in advance, organise breaks. Unseen disability – Intersectionality and international students only 5% tell us they are disabled versus 30% home students. We rely on students telling us before we can take action. Different types of disabilities can include caring for disabled family members. A classmate points out that Dyslexia funding at UAL isn’t friendly for international students – the wording comes across that it’s just available for home students.
Approachable, what practical steps can we make so that students can tell us? Race, gender and sexuality are all discussed yet we don’t discuss disability at UAL. We are labelled – how can we be handled? The university owns every moment of your time, empathy & respect is lacking and leads to burn out or a feeling of failing. You can speak to your Line manager and get support from HR. Look at the workplace adjustments procedure, get an occupational health consultation and an Individual Support Agreement. Course administrators should let us as staff know which of our students have these. Be as inclusive as possible.
Task 5 – Intersectional Identities
‘They’ is a gender-neutral pronoun. Non-traditional pronouns all are equal and as valid as she/her and he/him. ‘Pale, male’ status is not inclusive of diverse class and cultural backgrounds let alone respecting marginalised folks, language & politics. Through gender politics we need to reassess the singular they – more identifying as gender neutral. Gender is complicated but respect is simple. Non-traditional genders and gender identities need to be taken seriously and we need to decolonise our minds. You can have more than one pronoun. It is important to ask: What pronouns do you use? What are your pronouns? If you misgender apologise.
Task 6 – Key Data
I was shocked by the statistics that I found. Particularly the percentage of both male and particularly female prisoners with documented mental health issues. I also looked at schools’ exclusion policy for SEND students, it is deeply disturbing. Students with ADHD are more likely to be excluded from college and SEND students ‘account for almost two-thirds of all exclusions.’ My own experience in the primary schools of my children is completely different – I have only seen supportive staff and 1-to-1 assistants for those with ADHD but I realise this may be unusual. I plan to investigate these statistics verses my reality further.

‘A Guardian report (Ramesh, 2010), found black offenders were 44% more likely than white offenders to be sentenced to prison for driving offences, 38% more likely to be imprisoned for public disorder or possession of a weapon and 27% more likely for drugs possession. Overall black prisoners account for the largest number of minority ethnic prisoners (49%).’
Intersectionality
Miraz – ‘What is the purpose of identity?’ You can’t talk about feminism without talking about race. You can’t talk about one without talking about the other. For example – in class don’t assume anything, treat everyone as equal. Female, able-bodied, non-binary, transgender etc. Accessibility for a deaf student such as a well-designed Moodle page, make sure digital content is available, students sitting face-to-face with staff so that they can be lip read. The operating system is not designed for everyone, find creative ways to challenge the system and destabilising its power – it is all our responsibility. Continue learning and refreshing our thinking as everyone has a role to play, rest and pick your battles do the privilege walk – we are not all equal, we are all starting from different places in the room. The white position is universal. How do we include disabled people in our design choices? Guilt is individual, try to be compassionate and respectful.
Stacey reminds us – ‘You can’t pick and choose you either want justice and equality for all or you are not interested in any of it – that is how oppression works.’ Privilege: comes from the Latin privilege, a law for just one person – a benefit or privilege beyond what is available to others, an advantage.
We discuss equality and diversity in art and design, the challenges of increased group size. The atelier method of the master training the assistants, one-to-one teaching is no longer possible. We need to consider issues such as studio access for disabled students. Also, potential sites of conflict: students creating pieces of art relating & reflected sexuality and death that might be offensive to others due to their religion. These are all the things we need to be aware of and find a way to navigate. Consider the financial constraints for students on low incomes and access to study on art and design courses.
There is a lower number of staff of colour employed to teach art and design although the numbers of students are rising. There is also a disparity in degree attainment between white home students and students of colour. A large number of students now disclose disabilities such as dyslexia and choose to disclose mental health issues, especially post Covid which can have a long-term impact on their ability to study. This year I have had students caring for family members who have been really unwell which also affects the time and space they have to make & discover. Many things linked to disability such as access to healthcare hospital appointments, blue badges et cetera can all be very time-consuming.
Finally, we are reminded that as the unit progresses consider your artefact – how are you going to incorporate this into your practice? How are you taking all this knowledge and new reflection and apply to your teaching? Make a change in your teaching practice, design, plan it & try it out with colleagues, share with students and get feedback. Assume that you can’t actually teach it so do something I can do anyway such as a session plan, reading list, an aspect of teaching, a tool or a resource.
References
Discussions around trigger warnings
Gersen, J.S. (September 2021) What if Trigger Warnings Don’t Work? Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/what-if-trigger-warnings-dont-work
Social Justice/Buddhism/Queerness from Higher Power: Religion, Faith, Spirituality & Belief pp. 34-36
Shades of Noir (2017) Inclusive Practice: Alchemy – Transformation in Social Justice Teaching. Available at: https://shadesofnoir.org.uk/journals/inclusive-practice/
Barnwood Trust.
Waterman, J. (2020) Not All Disabilities Are Visible. Available at:
Finnigan, T. (May 2017) Ual Inclusive attainment case study: Make the Grade. Available at: https://www.arts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/19391/Incl_Attainment_Case_study_make_the_grade_PDF_410KB.pdf
Miraz, H. S. (1997) Black British Feminism. Routledge. Chapter 9 p70 -77. Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GdSqaz6NBMIC&pg=PA70&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false
Garrod, J. Silas, D. (2021). The Good Schools Guide. Available at:
https://www.goodschoolsguide.co.uk/special-educational-needs/your-rights/school-exclusions
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for England and Wales Annual Report 2018-19. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13tWueHEGiXMCrvMYhpbu3Dsxpzac2D90/view
Cunniffe, C. de Kerckhove R, V. Williams, K & Hopkins, K. (March 2012) Ministry of Justice Research Summary 4/12. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FjpGpvzXUO-YjvVY6gJc9d2v0Wk_EPZX/view
The Horizontals. TEDxBrum. Not all disabilities are visible. (2018) Available at:
(Accessed all 2023.)